Learn about the five common SEIS/EIS mistakes companies should avoid to attract investors and maximize their tax incentives.
Introduction
Navigating the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) and Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) can be a game-changer for UK startups seeking investment. These government-backed initiatives offer significant tax incentives for both companies and investors, making them highly attractive avenues for funding. However, to fully leverage these benefits and successfully attract investors, companies must be vigilant in avoiding common SEIS/EIS mistakes. In this article, we delve into the top five pitfalls that startups should steer clear of to maintain eligibility and appeal to angel investors.
1. Leaving Too Much of a Time Gap Between Receiving Investment and Issuing Shares
One of the most critical errors companies make is delaying the issuance of shares after receiving investment. The SEIS/EIS schemes require that shares are issued promptly upon investment to validate the transaction as an equity investment rather than a loan. A prolonged delay can lead HMRC to reclassify the investment, jeopardizing the tax benefits for investors.
How to Avoid This Mistake:
– Act Quickly: Ensure that once the funds are received, shares are issued without unnecessary delays.
– Use Advanced Subscription Agreements (ASA): If immediate issuance isn’t feasible, ASAs can provide a buffer, allowing time for formal valuation while maintaining eligibility.
– Prepare in Advance: Have all necessary documentation and processes in place to facilitate swift share issuance.
By streamlining the investment-to-share issuance process, companies can safeguard their SEIS/EIS eligibility and maintain investor confidence.
2. Not Issuing SEIS and EIS Shares in the Correct Order
Balancing SEIS and EIS investments requires meticulous planning. Issuing EIS shares before SEIS shares can unintentionally disqualify the company from SEIS benefits, as SEIS must be utilized first to maximize tax incentives.
Best Practices:
– Prioritize SEIS: Always issue SEIS shares before EIS shares to ensure eligibility under both schemes.
– Stagger Investment Rounds: Even if securing both funding types simultaneously, implement a short interval (e.g., one day) between issuing SEIS and EIS shares.
– Consult Experts: Engage with financial advisors or platforms like Oriel IPO to structure investment rounds correctly.
Proper sequencing of share issuance ensures that companies can fully exploit both SEIS and EIS opportunities without conflicts.
3. Forgetting the 30% Rule Includes “Associates”
The 30% rule is a cornerstone of SEIS/EIS eligibility, limiting investors to holding no more than 30% of a company’s shares. A common oversight is neglecting to account for “associates” of investors, which include business partners, trustees, and certain family members.
Key Considerations:
– Identify Associates: Recognize all individuals or entities associated with each investor who might hold shares.
– Monitor Share Distribution: Keep a detailed record of share ownership to ensure compliance with the 30% threshold, inclusive of associates.
– Educate Investors: Inform investors about the importance of accounting for their associates’ shareholdings.
Failing to adhere to the 30% rule can lead to disqualification from SEIS/EIS, affecting both the company and its investors’ tax benefits.
4. Not Checking if Investors Have Connections to the Company
SEIS/EIS regulations prohibit employees or certain connected individuals from being investors. Overlooking these connections can nullify the tax reliefs and expose the company to compliance issues.
Steps to Ensure Compliance:
– Conduct Thorough Due Diligence: Vet potential investors to ensure they have no direct or indirect ties to the company.
– Define Relationships Clearly: Establish clear criteria for what constitutes a connection, including roles like directors or significant shareholders.
– Implement Policies: Develop and enforce policies to prevent connected individuals from investing under SEIS/EIS.
Ensuring investors are independent helps maintain the integrity of the SEIS/EIS schemes and preserves the company’s eligibility.
5. Not Spending SEIS or EIS Funds Fast Enough
Both SEIS and EIS mandate that funds raised are actively utilized within specific timeframes—three years for SEIS and two years for EIS. Delays in spending these funds on qualifying business activities can result in the loss of eligibility, affecting investor tax benefits.
Effective Fund Management Strategies:
– Create a Detailed Budget: Plan out how and when funds will be allocated to various business operations.
– Track Expenditures: Maintain accurate records of how funds are spent to ensure compliance with scheme requirements.
– Prioritize Investments: Focus on high-impact activities that drive growth and qualify under SEIS/EIS guidelines.
Timely and strategic use of funds not only upholds SEIS/EIS eligibility but also demonstrates fiscal responsibility to investors.
Conclusion
Avoiding these SEIS/EIS mistakes is crucial for startups aiming to attract investors and maximize tax incentives. By promptly issuing shares, correctly sequencing SEIS and EIS investments, adhering to the 30% rule, ensuring investor independence, and efficiently managing funds, companies can maintain their eligibility and appeal to discerning angel investors.
Embracing these best practices not only enhances your company’s reputation but also fosters investor trust and long-term success. For more guidance on navigating SEIS/EIS requirements and optimizing your investment strategies, visit Oriel IPO today.
Ready to take your startup to the next level? Join Oriel IPO and connect with a network of dedicated investors eager to support your vision.
